Friday, October 2, 2015

89. Skin in Exchange for Skin


Now let's look at some individual statements in the Book of Job:


Jehovah said to Satan: you moved Me against him to destroy him without cause; Job 2:3,  or, you "badgered" me into doing something to Job that I had no reason to do.
  • How does this statement fit into the picture that theology has taught about Jehovah?  
  • How does this agree with the idea that God is always in complete control?
Satan answered Jehovah and said, Skin for skin, yea, all that a man has he will give for his life. 2:4.   It is interesting to see the different opinions that Bible commentaries have on this verse.

The sense will be clear if we translate it "Hide for skin, yea, all that a man hath will he give for himself." The hide of an animal, lion or sheep, which a man wears for clothing will be given up to save his own body. Expositors Bible Commentary.  A man would rather go around naked than lose his life. 


If a man's head or his eyes are in danger, he will lift up his hand or his arm, and expose that in order to save the other; ... and so it may in this sense; and mean the skin of his hand, as a shield for the skin of his head or eye. Gill's Bible Commentary.


A man willingly gives up another’s skin (life) for his own skin (life). So Job might bear the loss of his children, etc., with equanimity, so long as he remained unhurt himself. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown.


Misguided Instructions



His wife said to him, Do you still hold to your integrity? Curse God and die! 2:9 Modern King James.

However, in contrast, notice the same lengthy verse in Brenton's English Septuagint Version.

And when much time had passed, his wife said to him, How long wilt thou hold out, saying, Behold, I wait yet a little while, expecting the hope of my deliverance? for, behold, thy memorial is abolished from the earth, (everything by which people measured your importance is gone) even thy sons and daughters, the pangs and pains of my womb which I bore in vain with sorrows; (In this version she rightfully decries the death of her children.  In the book of Job that most of us know, her right to mourn the death of her ten children is not even alluded to) and thou thyself sittest down to spend the nights in the open air among the corruption of worms, and I am a wanderer and a servant from place to place and house to house, waiting for the setting of the sun, that I may rest from my labours and my pangs which now beset me. She has become a domestic servant, looking for work wherever she might find it.  She is obligated to work till the setting of the sun. Job 2:9.

She says to her loving husband, but say some word against the Lord, and die. 2:9.  If you would simply curse Jehovah, He would punish you with death and you would be set free from your agony.  

Of Job the Bible says, that man was perfect and upright, and one who feared God and turned aside from evil. 1:1.  Still, the first of Job's three comforters came up with this "brilliant" bit of false theology;
  • Remember, please, who ever perished, being innocent? 4:7 Modern King James.  
  • No truly innocent person has ever died young. 4:7 Contemporary English.  
Job could see past his friend's theology, and said Right words are powerful, but what does your arguing argue? 6:25.  You say that I am suffering because I am guilty; I purpose this idea, Oh that my grief were but weighed, and my ruin laid in the balances together! For now it (my ruin) would be heavier than the sand of the sea; 6:2-3.

Another translation makes it very clear O that my sins, whereby I have deserved wrath, and the calamity that I suffer, were weighed in a balance. If I have to pay for my sins by suffering, justice has already extracted more than what is fair. Darby's Version.

Is there not a warfare to man on earth? Are people not born to fight a difficult battle?  Now that Job has given up on regaining his health, with Saint Paul he says, I have fought the good fight. 2 Tim. 4:7.

Are not his days also like the days of a hireling?  A hireling is a servant who was hired to perform a certain task, and when that task was finished his position was terminated, so, with Paul, in sorrow Job says, I have finished the course. 2 Tim. 4:7.

As a servant earnestly desires the shadow; the shades of night, to get some rest, just so Job is anticipating death, and just as surely as a hireling looks for his wages Job is expecting the appropriate remuneration for having lived an upright life.  Job 7:1-2.  Later, Saint Paul echos Job's words, Now there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, shall give me at that Day; and not to me only, but also to all those who love His appearing. 2 Tim. 4:8.

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

88. Why Do The Righteous Suffer?


It Would Be Nice To Know


Why do the righteous suffer?  There are about as many answers to this question as there are people with opinions.  Philosophers will deduce, argue, surmise and come up with opinions that one can accept or reject as one is inclined to.  Theologians will find their favourite Bible verses to prove their arguments; sensible or otherwise.

Why do the righteous suffer?  Because they were careless or did something foolish.  This is often true, but because that answer isn't deep, philosophical or theological we will bypass that one.

Why do the righteous suffer?  It is a method of teaching patience.  In some cases, it works, but because it is not always successful that cannot be the complete answer.  Besides which, we all know somebody who should be made to suffer if it would create more patience in that person.  Why, then, isn't that person suffering?

Why do the righteous suffer?  A simple answer is, suffering brings us closer to Christ.  This would be a great answer if it was true 100% of the time.  However, since it isn't always the case, that answer is not sufficient.  Job is portrayed, as a shining example, because he was one of those who did not lose his faith.  There are many cases where Christians completely lose their faith because of sociological, physical or material setbacks; those things that we might call "unanswered prayers".

Why do the righteous suffer?  Because life happens!  The righteous suffer, so do the wicked.  What happens to one is liable to happen to anyone.  There is no distinction.  The sense is, that as certainly as man is born, so sure is it that he will have trouble. It follows from the condition of our being, as certainly as ... sparks will ascend.  Based on Job 5:7 in Barnes Com.  This sounds as though Jehovah is not normally involved with an individual's situation.  Christ intimated as much when he said, For he makes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the just and the unjust. Mat. 5:45. Christ was not speaking only of the weather; His is a generic statement which says, righteous or unrighteous - you get what you get. 

Let Us Not Blame Jehovah


J
ob, in contrast to his friends, stated his point of view concisely, One dies in his full strength, being wholly at ease and quiet. ... And another dies with bitter soul, and never eats with pleasure. They lie down together in the dust, and the worms shall cover them. Job 21:23-26.  This is not a comforting point of view but it is a lot more realistic than a lot of things we have heard from the pulpit.

Jehovah can, and will, take direct actions for people when He chooses to.  However, as a general rule "mother nature" will do whatever she will do; people's lives will be lost or destroyed, but in most cases, none of these things can be blamed on Jehovah; He simply was not involved.

Many Christians get much comfort from believing that Jehovah is in control of the very minutest aspect of their lives.  So, whether it is logical, or not, they attribute everything that happens in their lives to the plans of a higher power.  If one follows through with this logic one must end up with the following conclusion.
  • It is Jehovah who sends mudslides which bury whole villages; 
  • He sends tornadoes and earthquakes which kill thousands of people.  
  • He allows droughts so that many people will starve to death.  
Is this the "God of Love" that the Bible tells us about?  No, that is a picture of a heinous God!  Therefore we cannot accept that Jehovah, the God of the Bible, is in charge of everything that happens in the world.

If we do not want to accept that "mother nature" is in charge of what happens Saint Paul gave us another option.  In 2 Cor. 4:4 he tells us that Satan is the god of this world.  Killing and maiming millions of humans certainly fits his profile.  Why must we insist that Jehovah is in complete control of everything when so many experiences completely belie that theory?

Theologians insist that Satan could harass Job only so far as Jehovah would allow.  On the surface of the story, it seems to read that way, but the story can also be read like this.  Jehovah says to Satan, In view of the contest you are proposing, there are a few rules that must be in place.  This is not to say that Jehovah would universally limit Satan, but He did limit him for this contest, to keep it fair.
  1. In the first round, according to the rules, Satan could destroy everything Job owned, but his health he could not touch.  
  2. In the second round Satan was given permission to take Job's health, but, according to the rules of the contest, he was not allowed to kill him.
Theology took a wrong turn when it began telling us that there is only one God and that He is omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent.  This, they do, in spite of the fact that many of the books in the Bible distinctly teach that there are many Gods and that the Gods have limitations.

I substantiated that theory, based on the Bible, in several posts I wrote in 2012.  If you are interested in reading more about this topic go to:

http://wwwthinkagai.blogspot.com/2012/05/the-ot-teaching-about-various-gods.html 

https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=1637145687407695180#editor/target=post;postID=8153329281419291689;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=86;src=link

https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=1637145687407695180#editor/target=post;postID=6584851863965326572;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=85;src=link

https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=1637145687407695180#editor/target=post;postID=4692976470260242905;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=84;src=link

Friday, September 25, 2015

87. Satan Among the Sons of God


A Few Twists In Job



  1. Some Bible scholars believe that Job is the oldest book in the Bible.  
  2. Some students place Ur on the northern shore of Persian Gulf; not far from Abraham's birthplace. 
  3. If Moses wrote the Books of Moses we are forced to believe that when the writer of Job refers to God he was not thinking of Jehovah in the same sense as Moses and the later Israelites did.  Jehovah was not known, by name, to humans until He introduced Himself to Moses at the burning bush. Exodus 3:14.
However, when Satan came to present himself to God at the general meeting, Job 2, the writer uses the name Jehovah for God.  This is a strong indication that this book was probably written after the Israelites had settled in the Promised Land and certainly after the author heard the story of "The burning bush".

If we admit that the following scene is simply the writer's way of setting the background of the story, the technical problems look after themselves.  However, those who insist that the Book of Job happened exactly as it is recorded, encounter a few huge theological problems in the first two chapters.

Huge Problems


1.  Now on the day when God’s sons came to present themselves before Yahweh, Satan also came among them. 1:6.  Most Bible commentators, perhaps without much thought, tell us that, in this case, God's sons, means angels.

It is interesting that of eight different translations of the Bible that were checked, in this regard, only three leave it as the sons of God.   One of them has a footnote, which says sons of God means angels. Five of the translations use the word, angels in the text, but as a footnote, they say that in the Hebrew language it reads, sons of God. 


This is a good example of how easily Bible translators can shape or reshape theology, simply by changing a few seemingly innocent words, but words that carry a world of theological significance!

All the versions, and indeed all the critics, are puzzled with the phrase sons of God; ... beney haelohim, literally, sons of the God. ... if we give not the literal translation of the Hebrew, we may give what(ever) translation we please. Clarke's Bible commentary. 


This, it seems, is done much too often.  Bible teachers have been taught a "certain truth" and they will repeat it without even wondering if it is actually true!  Let us at least do our own thinking; the Lord has also blessed each one of us with a mind!

The following quotes are from a post I did on July 18, 2012:

One of the errors that the church is forced to uphold because she believes that there is only one God, is that Satan is an angel.  When Satan, one of the gods, took up arms against Jehovah, the war in heaven took place.  That war is recorded in Isaiah 14, Ezekiel 28 and in The Revelation.

A story about the war in heaven makes absolutely no sense if we insist on believing that God is Omnipotent and that Satan is merely an angel.  There could be no meaningful contest between two contestants so unequally matched.  The image that presents itself to the mind is that of a professional wrestler in the ring, trying to defend his title against a newborn baby. 

I will exalt my throne above the stars of God; Isa. 14:13.  If Satan is just an angel how is it that he has a throne?  Michael and Gabriel do not have thrones.  Only potentates have thrones.  Nowhere does the Bible teach that Satan is an angel.  That is merely a supposition the church has handed us because she believes there is only one God.


Satan also said, I will sit on the mount of assembly in the far north. Isa. 14:13.  Who is on the mount of assembly?  Common theology has placed God there.   
  • Billy Graham even suggested that the reason there are no stars in the north is because that is where God’s throne is.  
  • Considering that, according to church theology, Jehovah is omnipresent, is His confinement to a throne in the Northern hemisphere logical? 
  • Is Jehovah closer to the Northern hemisphere than He is to the Southern hemisphere?             
2. Yahweh said to Satan, “Where have you come from?” Job 1:7.  Satan, seemingly, did not think that it was a redundant question because he gave the Lord a straightforward answer.  

The Lord asked him another question, Have you considered my servant Job. Job 2:2.  Again, Satan answered the question, as if it was a reasonable question for Jehovah to ask because Jehovah did not know.  

3. Furthermore, Satan suggested that Job worshipped the Lord for selfish reasons and that they (Jehovah and Satan) should have ‘a little contest’ to see if he (Satan) was right.  The Lord must have thought that this "contest thing" was a good idea.  From reading the story, it seems that the Lord also did not know the outcome of that contest!

If we are not comfortable with the ideas that Satan is one of the sons of the Gods and that Jehovah is less than omniscient (all-knowing), we are in a position where we are forced to accept the idea that the setting in the book of Job is a literary device only and therefore the book of Job must be viewed as a philosophical book, not a historical one.

For more on the topic of Jehovah's characteristics might I suggest:                                              http://wwwthinkagai.blogspot.com/2012/05/the-ot-teaching-about-various-gods.html